I’m excited to have joined the board of directors of the
Manhattan New Music Project.Founded in 1990 by late jazz artist Paul Nash
(listen to his album here), the Manhattan New Music Project (MNMP) has steadily advanced its dual mission to educate audiences in jazz and improvisational music forms, while offering student populations opportunities to experience hands-on art-making. MNMP has presented music by emerging artists through our New York City-based concert series, New Composers, Interactive Music, and New York Anthems. These concerts have been held at such venues as Carnegie Hall, Galapagos Art Space, Abrons Arts Center, Chelsea Art Museum, and N6 Media Labs.
On the educational side there are many cool programs that make me wish I was back in school again. MNMP has a Dept. of Education grant that funds, among other things, a “Blank Page to Stage” program where elementary school kids write and perform their own musicals, a music program to study Brazilian percussion, and a dance workshop comparing West African folk dancing with modern hip-hop dancing. A big 20th Anniversary party is coming up in early 2010, stay tuned.
Posted via email from danielg’s posterous | Comment »
Read the last line first. Unlike Radiohead, it would be hard to argue that these guys had a brand, I mean the game has won some awards, but in a niche of a niche of a niche. And more importantly (when you think about the speed of market value drop-off of a console game from launch date), this game is old.
Posted via email from danielg’s posterous | Comment »
The FDIC does not want to borrow directly from the Treasury for political reasons, even though it has a $100 billion line of credit. As a result, additional loan interest will go to the healthy banks without any risk on the part of those banks. Why? Because, the healthy banks don’t need to use their own money, they can just act as the middleman by borrowing from the Fed at near zero interest rates and passing the money on to the FDIC. Articles on this issue have in large part been misleading in presentation of the FDIC’s goal of using future bank assessments to repay the bonds. But the reason the loan to the FDIC is needed in the first place is that the other banks can’t afford to pay assessments now, and if they can’t pay in the future, then the taxpayer will. So this is another bailout, this time of smaller banks, backstopped by the government.
I am not against all bailouts, but this one could be shady.
Look at the last sentence of the NY Times article above. The banks would receive bonds in exchange for the loan at a rate set by the Treasury Secretary. That interest rate would represent a direct transfer of value from taxpayers to private banks without value in exchange, and how ironic that the article claims it would be done to avoid political furor.
Posted via email from danielg’s posterous | Comment »